Re: If Kerry is elected...

From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/25/04 

Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:39:18 GMT

Tom Seim wrote:
> rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote in message news:<20041024144220.00243.00001632@mb-m26.aol.com>...
>
>>>Subject: Re: If Kerry is elected...
>>>From: soar2morrow@yahoo.com (Tom Seim)
>>>
>>>rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>From: soar2morrow@yahoo.com (Tom Seim)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It's been that way for some time now. When Clintoon was making a
>>>>>mockery of the White House the typical lib refrain was "That was
>>>>>between two consenting adults". Compare that to the libs demand that
>>>>>DeLay resign as Majority Leader because of an "admonishment" by the
>>>>>ethics committee.
>>>>
>>>>Yeah, he only offered $100K to a congressmans son for his political
>>>
>> campaign,
>>
>>>>for a vote. Heck nothing wrong with that right, wrong! This is not a bridge
>>>
>> for
>>
>>>>you district this is a bribe!
>>>>
>>>
>>So, your admitting your wrong on this one?
>>
>>
>>>>>Then take the case of Trent Lott, who made the fatal
>>>>>sin of praising a man who had been a racist, Strom Thurmond. No
>>>>>apology by Lott could placate the libs, who smelled blood in the
>>>>>water.
>>>>
>>>>I think it was the Republican leadership and not the libs that told Trent
>>>
>> to go
>>
>>>>for a walk!
>>>
>>>You are correct, but only after a hue and cry from every corner of the
>>>liberal world, including politicians, actors and pretend reverends.
>>
>>Oh, yeah, no real Black people were offended at all, they were too busy looking
>>for chickens and growing watermellon, right Tom?
>
>
> Boy, you sure are disrespectful to African-Americans. I am surprised
> you wrote that. Personally, I would be ashamed if I had written that.

Why? It is a statement of your attitudes. You are very transparent as an
arrogant elitist and racist. You better not go walking into a black
neighborhoods if you know what's good for you.

>
>
>>>I
>>>personally thought the GOP leadership misplaced their collective
>>>backbones on this one.
>>>
>>
>>I did too, and that was strange, maybe they had some other stuff on Lott and
>>this was just a good place to dump him, who knows.

Nah- he deserved to be dumped for that single statement criticizing the
past 50 years of Federal civil rights policy in this country.

>>
>>
>>>>I think most liberals were suprised because we didn't think what he
>>>>said was so bad.
>>>
>>>That is precisely the point I am making. The vitriol coming from the
>>>lib camp on this issue was truely amazing.
>>>
>>
>> No, it wasn't, the Bush admin made a preemptive strike on Lott.
>>
>>>>Maybe Bush thought he could get some black votes.
>>>
>>>Bush thought he could, and did, get black votes before this "event".
>>>And Bush's polling among blacks have doubled since 2000.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah up to 18%, whopping increase.
>>
>>>>>Only a resignation would do. And the bastards got it!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>>>Libs are not bothered in the least by an obvious, blatant lack of
>>>>>balance in their statements and positions. This is the way it is, get
>>>>>used to it because it ain't gonna change.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You right wing idealogues are really something. You mentioned Clinton, the
>>>
>> man
>>
>>>>that you righties hounded for years, and shut down the federal govt. for a
>>>
>>>year
>>>
>>>I did think it was wrong for Clinton to shut down the government.
>>>
>>
>>Yeah, he should have resigned, however the rabid foaming in their pants
>>Republican lynch mob was so completly out of line with the actual wrong doing
>>in this case, that it makes the basis for your point nearly invisible by
>>comparison.
>>
>>
>>>>to do your political attack work. Are neocons born without the concept of
>>>>hypocrisy in addition to being dishonable?
>>>>
>>>>Rocky
>>>>I
>>>
>>>I agree conservatives aren't as hypocritical or dishonorable as
>>>liberals by orders of magnitude.
>>>
>>
>>Not only have you proven my point, you doubled before I made my contract.
>>Everything you side says is wrong, every charge you make against the other side
>>is twice as valid when leveled back against you.
>>
>>In truth, your just a bunch of wankers that are out to look and talk tough, and
>>pretend there are simple solutions to complex problems.
>>
>>Rocky
>
>
> What is a "wanker", anyhow?
>
> I follow a principal that has been proven valid over and over again:
> KISS - Keep It Simple, Stupid!

We can see that- you have successfully become both simple and stupid.

>
> There are so many simple solutions that people tend to overlook them.
> For years conservatives have been saying that the solution to welfare
> moms is to put them to work. Liberals kept on resisting, coming up
> with excuses for these people. Well, finally one President saw the
> light. And guess who that was: Clinton! Now, the majority of these
> moms are back to work and we have broken the cycle of welfare
> enslavement. This was probably one of Clinton's greatest achievements.
> And I salute him for it.
>
> Tom

Clinton's welfare reform was wholly different from any Republican
proposal, it is nothing the GOP can take credit for.