Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II
From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: O.T. Explosives story about to fizzle out"
- Previous message: Mac: "Re: Audio/Video distribution inquiry"
- In reply to: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Next in thread: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Reply: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:03:23 GMT
Tom Seim wrote:
> bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) wrote in message
> news:<7c584d27.0410261342.664b415c@posting.google.com>...
>
>> soar2morrow@yahoo.com (Tom Seim) wrote in message
>> news:<6c71b322.0410251944.4d66f058@posting.google.com>...
>>
>>> Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>> news:<417D10E6.6060503@nospam.com>...
>>>
>>>> Tom Seim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote in message
>>>>> news:<20041024033822.18077.00005777@mb-m03.aol.com>... ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That sounds worse to me. However, all Bush voters should be
>>>>>> yelled at, though it seems unlikely anything less than use
>>>>>> of hammers would have any effect on their thick skulls!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for proving my case, Rocky.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't stated a case since you started posting here-
>>>> you're just a smug little phony wannabe bs artist, and you are
>>>> just another alienated freak in your home state.
>>>
>>> The case if obvious to anyone with an IQ better than 50 - OH,
>>> guess that leaves you out, fredfraud!
>>
>> The case stops being obvious to those whose IQ is rather higher
>> than 50 - not one of my real-world U.S. acquaintances is going to
>> vote for Bush, and the common factor here is that they have all
>> earned post-graduate degrees and work as academics, which means
>> that their IQ's are all going to be higher than 110.
>>
>> It must be nice to live in your nice simple little world, where you
>> can choose to be believe that Dubbya is telling the truth, and
>> everybody else is lying. The real world is a little more
>> complicated than that, but I'm not volunteering to try to educate
>> you - I'm really not that good with slow students.
>>
>> ------- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
>
>
> Thanks for your insight. I have conversations with PhD's that are
> going to vote for Kerry - and other PhD's that are going to vote for
> Bush. Do you REALLY think that EVERYTHING Kerry has told you is the
> truth? If so, you are one gullible sonofabitch. Let's be realistic
> here, there is spin going on from BOTH SIDES!
Is that what outright fraudulent propaganda and misrepresentation is
called these days- spin? So Bush was only "spinning" when he mislead
Congress and the American people about Iraq, and Bush was only
"spinning" when he sent 150,000 troops into theater without sufficient
armament, logistics support, or post-occupation plans, and Bush is only
"spinning" when he lies about how well "freedom" is doing "on the march"
in Iraq, and Bush is "spinning" those nearly one trillion dollars in
lost revenues in tax cuts to the super rich, and Bush is just "spinning"
when he tells us the air is cleaner than ever and we can trash all of
the EPA inspections, and Bush is just "spinning" when he says those 2.5
million lost permanently to overseas will return someday, and Bush is
just "spinning" and "spinning" and "spinning"...no wonder he always
looks so dumb. Why don't you go tell the tens of thousands of relatives
of the 1100+ KIAs, and the 12,000 horribly maimed for life veterans,
that it's only "spin."
- Next message: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: O.T. Explosives story about to fizzle out"
- Previous message: Mac: "Re: Audio/Video distribution inquiry"
- In reply to: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Next in thread: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Reply: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|