Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II
From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Chaos Master: "Re: change kelvin to centigrade"
- Previous message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: If Kerry is elected..."
- In reply to: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Next in thread: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Reply: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:04:14 GMT
Tom Seim wrote:
> Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<417FB4B9.5060807@nospam.com>...
>
>>Tom Seim wrote:
>>
>>>>>Thanks for your insight. I have conversations with PhD's that are
>>>>>going to vote for Kerry - and other PhD's that are going to vote for
>>>>>Bush. Do you REALLY think that EVERYTHING Kerry has told you is the
>>>>>truth? If so, you are one gullible sonofabitch. Let's be realistic
>>>>>here, there is spin going on from BOTH SIDES!
>>>>
>>>>Is that what outright fraudulent propaganda and misrepresentation is
>>>>called these days- spin? So Bush was only "spinning" when he mislead
>>>>Congress and the American people about Iraq, and Bush was only
>>>>"spinning" when he sent 150,000 troops into theater without sufficient
>>>>armament, logistics support, or post-occupation plans, and Bush is only
>>>>"spinning" when he lies about how well "freedom" is doing "on the march"
>>>>in Iraq, and Bush is "spinning" those nearly one trillion dollars in
>>>>lost revenues in tax cuts to the super rich, and Bush is just "spinning"
>>>>when he tells us the air is cleaner than ever and we can trash all of
>>>>the EPA inspections, and Bush is just "spinning" when he says those 2.5
>>>>million lost permanently to overseas will return someday, and Bush is
>>>>just "spinning" and "spinning" and "spinning"...no wonder he always
>>>>looks so dumb. Why don't you go tell the tens of thousands of relatives
>>>>of the 1100+ KIAs, and the 12,000 horribly maimed for life veterans,
>>>>that it's only "spin."
>>>
>>>
>>>Answer the question: do you REALLY think that EVERYTHING Kerry has
>>>told you is the truth?
>>
>>What statements in particular do you have in mind? A victory for Kerry
>>will be a victory for bipartisan government restoration to mend the
>>damage done by the incompetent idiot Bush and his ever shrinking circle
>>of clueless ideologues. A vote for the GOP is a vote for a criminally
>>incompetent autocrat, and a vote for Kerry is a vote for an executive
>>bipartisan coalition. Only a simple idiot would think the race boils
>>down to two personalities. The word coming out of DC is not good- this
>>Bush character is becoming more and more irrational and pushing what few
>>ideologues who remain out of his inner circle of nutcase prayer session
>>idiots. The criminally incompetent Bush is waiting until after the
>>elections to ask for another trillion dollar increase in national debt (
>>his second trillion dollar increase BTW) and $70B *more* for Iraq on top
>>of the $25 already budgeted for this FY- which Pentagon projects to be
>>bare minimum- bringing the Iraq total to $225B, and an additional 40,000
>>troops for the bogus elections there. Army recruitment is dropping like
>>a rock-already at 30% shortfalls, and servicemen are successfully suing
>>against the illegality of the indefinite extensions of service due to
>>fact that no war has been formally declared. It takes quite a monumental
>>incompetent to bring America to its knees but Bush has done
>>it-everything is coming apart at the center- there will be massive
>>government shutdowns across the board and possibly default. Congress
>>should exercise their authority and shut the whole damned thing down and
>>institute immediate impeachment proceedings to get rid of Bush ASAP. You
>>watch and see, something like this WILL happen. The US is a system of
>>checks and balances, the President is NOT a dictator, and the idiot will
>>stress that architecture to something unprecedented in American history-
>>Bush WILL be ejected one way or the other. The most orderly process is
>>simply to vote him out and then lame duck him into oblivion. This has
>>nothing to do with spin, this has nothing to do with politics, this has
>>everything to do with the most incredibly incompetent fraud to ever gain
>>control of the White House.
>
>
> This is a REAL SIMPLE question, why don't you answer it?
I'm getting fed the f_ck up with your lack of comprehension. Wasn't my
first question to you about getting specific:"What statements in
particular do you have in mind?" And this was after you asked:"do you
REALLY think that EVERYTHING Kerry has told you is the truth?" If this
is some retarded way of asking about credibility, then the answer is
that Kerry is orders of magnitude more credible than Bush. The simple
reason for this is that Kerry can explain every issue to any degree of
depth necessary, whereas Bush is so shallow as to be nearly
dimensionless with statements like "I am President so I don't have to
give a reason why" and "I just know it in my heart"- he is true idiot-
hard to imagine anyone trusting him with a paper route job- he
epitomizes the low point of the most thorough moral corruption of
American society:grab the idiot with a name and put him out front. And
he will tell /me/ a reason "why"- or he can go to hell as far as I'm
concerned.
- Next message: Chaos Master: "Re: change kelvin to centigrade"
- Previous message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: If Kerry is elected..."
- In reply to: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Next in thread: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Reply: Tom Seim: "Re: The Not-So-Democratic Party, Part II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
