Re: RS-232 converted to INFRARED
From: Michael (Micksa) Slade (micksa-news_at_knobbits.org)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Richard: "Re: PC Auto-power-on"
- Previous message: N. Thornton: "Re: Crossover distortion and NFB"
- In reply to: Scrotor: "RS-232 converted to INFRARED"
- Next in thread: Tim Shoppa: "Re: RS-232 converted to INFRARED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:17:13 GMT
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:58:57 -0700, Scrotor wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Ive been looking for schematic to do such and have questions on ones i
> have found.
>
> Heres one link im looking at:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/7156/laser6.jpg
>
> Im sorta new with the rs-232/serial communication, and am wondering
> about the CTS, RTS, ext... signals and how they dont seem to be used
> in the above schematic. Im assuming that CTS, RTS, ext.. are signals
> for the recipe of handshaking? What i have in mind is converting
> RS-232 from some 1489/1488 IC's to infared, then back to the RS-232
> level to feed to another combo of 1489/1488s. With all these different
> data lines, how are they combined for one signle infrared signal?
> would there have to be seperate IR leds for them?
They're not :)
They don't generally need to be.
The only real use for the other lines is for flow control, which can also
be achieved by sending certain data through the TX line (this is what
XON/XOFF, or software, flow control is).
If you *really* needed to have those lines in there, you'd have to use a
more complex solution that would involve multiplexing the other lines and
encoding them over a single stream. Which brings me to my next point
That circuit you've shown is overly simple. There's no modulation or
anything - the RS232 signals are simply turned into IR verbatim. This
means there's nothing to correct noisy reception, handle any kind of
interference from other IR sources, or recover from a communication break.
For error *detection* at least, you could use parity over the serial
line, but it won't be all that effective.
If you put it together into a real circuit, it may work but you might find
you'll have problems with it, e.g. it will only work with the lights off.
Having said all that, I wouldn't know where to find a better circuit :)
Anyone?
-- My email address is "micksa@", not "micksa-news@". VOTE [1] CAPITAL PUNISHMENT FOR SPAMMERS
- Next message: Richard: "Re: PC Auto-power-on"
- Previous message: N. Thornton: "Re: Crossover distortion and NFB"
- In reply to: Scrotor: "RS-232 converted to INFRARED"
- Next in thread: Tim Shoppa: "Re: RS-232 converted to INFRARED"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|