Re: BUSH WINS!
From: Brian (bellis350_at_comcast.net)
Date: 11/03/04
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Nerds for Kerry"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: Recommend transistor?"
- In reply to: Adam. Seychell: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Next in thread: Frank Bemelman: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:31:01 -0600
"Adam. Seychell" <invald@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:418945ba$0$7344$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Brian wrote:
>
>> "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
>> news:2usbuuF2d48s3U1@uni-berlin.de...
>> > Brian wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:2usap8F2eha2qU1@uni-berlin.de...
>> >> > Brian wrote:
>> >> >> "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:2us2diF2f4l05U1@uni-berlin.de...
>> >> >> > Paul Burridge wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> It's a funny old world where a guy can get re-elected
having
>> taken
>> >> his
>> >> >> >> country to war over nothing but a Big Lie. A
>> precedent-creating
>> >> >> >> "pre-emptive strike" where there was no actual threat!
We all
>> make
>> >> >> >> mistakes, but the least we'd expect if we make a mistake
of
>> that
>> >> >> >> magnitude would be to get the sack and spend the next
few
>> years in
>> >> >> >> prison. Instead, his actions have been *endorsed* by the
>> >> electorate!
>> >> >> >> Oh well; it's your business, I guess. I just hope the
same
>> thing
>> >> >> >> doesn't happen here in Britland in 6 months' time.
>> >> >> >> Anyway, thank God it's all over. No more OT political
>> postings!
>> >> >> >> Yippee!!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Well, here's a prediction for Bush's next term.
>> >> >> > A vast increase in global terrorism, total alienation of
the
>> >> Islamic
>> >> >> world,
>> >> >> > severe decrease in freedom in the West, and at least one
major
>> NBC
>> >> >> attack on a
>> >> >> > Western or US city.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Add to that a the breakup of Iraq and much of it going
Islamic
>> >> >> Fundamentalist,
>> >> >> > with a Turkish invasion of the North.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Indecisive war with Iran, but without significant US
ground
>> troops
>> >> >> (leading to
>> >> >> > accelerated Iranian nuclear programs). Pakistan's
Musharraf
>> >> assassinated
>> >> >> and the
>> >> >> > nation going Islamic Fundie (more so than at present).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Problems with China as it becomes the new New Cold War
>> bogeyman and
>> >> >> scapegoat.
>> >> >> > The US verges on bankruptcy with massive devaluation of
the
>> dollar.
>> >> Oil
>> >> >> prices
>> >> >> > continue to rise due to ME instability. Recognition that
peak
>> oil
>> >> >> production has
>> >> >> > occurred earlier than expected due to such problems.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Dirk
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The Consensus:-
>> >> >> > The political party for the new millenium
>> >> >> > http://www.theconsensus.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You guys are pathetic. Your guy didn't win, because
you
>> >> >> didn't come up with someone better, or have a better
plan.
>> >> >> Kerry was such a zero, he had very little effect on
this
>> >> election.
>> >> >> This was more a race between Bush and Bush. His good
>> >> >> points versus his bad points. If your party would've
had
>> >> >> someone with something better, had a better vision
for
>> this
>> >> >> country, was a motivator instead of a divider, you
>> would've
>> >> >> probably won hands down. All Kerry could do was try
to
>> >> >> discredit Bush, because Kerry (and his party), had
nothing
>> >> >> better to offer. Sorry guys, you missed a golden
>> opportunity.
>> >> >> Even though you have lost, you still spread your vile
>> garbage.
>> >> >> You are like kids, that don't know how to grow up.
>> >> >
>> >> > My party is in my sigline.
>> >> > And if you took the trouble to check you'll discover I'm
British.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Dirk
>> >> >
>> >> > The Consensus:-
>> >> > The political party for the new millenium
>> >> > http://www.theconsensus.org
>> >>
>> >> And if you took the trouble to look, you would see that I was
>> responding
>> >> to what Dirk Bruere wrote.
>> >
>> > Er... the Democrats are not my party.
>> > The Consensus is.
>> > Additionally, we shall see who is right in 4yrs (or sooner).
>> > My predictions are on record.
>> > Care to make some of your own?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dirk
>> >
>> > The Consensus:-
>> > The political party for the new millenium
>> > http://www.theconsensus.org
>>
>> I predict that your predictions are all wet. Many of the
>> Nay sayers, underestimate Bush's intellenence (which
>> is where they make their biggest mistake). You are
>> in good company though, because Bin Laden and
>> Saddam Hosain (and the Democrates), made the
>> same mistake. We both seem to agree though,
>> that this is a very dangerous world that we live in.
>> Taking the passive approach, will only increase
>> our danger. No one knows what the future will bring,
>> but I would rather take my chances with Bush than
>> Kerry, any day.
>> Brian
>
> Well, I couldn't agree more. If robber were to rob a bank then he/she
> wouldn't get very far going the passive approach, they'll need a big gun
> or something. Similarly, if the Bush administration wants America to
> have domination and prosperity at the expense of other nations then it
> certainly cannot take the passive approach either. The robber could be
> faced with a threat from the victim and so it would be an safety
> advantage for the robber to carry a weapon and use it if necessary. So I
> have to agree, the passive will only increase the danger to Americans.
>
Oh yes, that is a real good comparison, a robber to a terroriest.
It's people
with your kind of mentallity that gives terroriest the oppertunity
and time, to
do anything they want. I'm sure you think that all you have to do is
to get the
U.N., to put pressure on them and they will stop (you live in a
fantasy world).
It's people that think like you, that give them all the time and
resources they
need, to train and infiltrate our country, to use the most potent
weapon they
can buy or steal on us. As time goes by, they will get more and more
potent
weapons. We have to stop them now, whatever it takes. Yes we pay a
price
for our actions now, but we will pay a much bigger price later, if
we don't stop
them now. If your reasoning power is so weak that you can't see
this, then
I feel sorry for you, and the rest of the world (if there is a lot
more like you).
Brian
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Nerds for Kerry"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: Recommend transistor?"
- In reply to: Adam. Seychell: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Next in thread: Frank Bemelman: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: BUSH WINS!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|