Which flash card interface to design in?

From: Tony (tony_roe_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 11/09/04 

Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:04:17 +1000

Hi,

There are a lot of standards around now for small, cheap flash memory
modules, and sockets seem to be readily available for most of them. I
need to incorporate the option for an arbitrary amount of extra flash
in a new design, so I'd like to include a socket for one of these.

But which is the most likely to still be supported in a few years
time? Which one is the easiest to interface to?

Answers, hints, links all welcome.

Tony (remove the "_" to reply by email)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Which flash card interface to design in?
    ... > There are a lot of standards around now for small, cheap flash memory ... and sockets seem to be readily available for most of them. ... I believe there is a smaller variant of the MMC as well which may be around ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Which flash card interface to design in?
    ... >> There are a lot of standards around now for small, cheap flash memory ... and sockets seem to be readily available for most of them. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c
    ... No one minds ten different kinds of kettles in the shop. ... Unless you have 10 standards for sockets. ... So we've got ten different plugs, and ten different matching sockets. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: How Common Lisp sucks
    ... CL lacks standardized support for many operations that are ... standards, e.g. UFFI, but these claims are false. ... Very funny, I don't know of any standardization in C about Sockets, ... Database connectivity and probably a few others, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Which flash card interface to design in?
    ... Interfacing looks easy enough too. ... >> There are a lot of standards around now for small, cheap flash memory ... and sockets seem to be readily available for most of them. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)