Re: Which flash card interface to design in?
From: Anders F (af-spam_at_hi5.dk)
Date: 11/09/04
- Next message: Terry Given: "Re: Proper breakthroughs/inventions."
- Previous message: Haris: "Re: AT89C2051 trigering relay problem"
- In reply to: Tony: "Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Next in thread: sPoNiX: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Reply: sPoNiX: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Reply: Tony: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:58:55 +0100
"Tony" <tony_roe@tpg.com.au> wrote in message
news:f7u0p0luqk7ibin4f47sspmq3p9ead46hh@4ax.com...
> Hi,
>
> There are a lot of standards around now for small, cheap flash memory
> modules, and sockets seem to be readily available for most of them. I
> need to incorporate the option for an arbitrary amount of extra flash
> in a new design, so I'd like to include a socket for one of these.
> But which is the most likely to still be supported in a few years
> time?
CF and SD will be around for some time as they are both used extensively
everywhere =). CF has traditionally been cheaper per MB (probably because
the controller enables use of non-perfect flash parts) and is definitely
available in much larger capacities. However, the SD is smaller and the
sockets cheaper.
/A
> Which one is the easiest to interface to?
>
> Answers, hints, links all welcome.
>
> Tony (remove the "_" to reply by email)
- Next message: Terry Given: "Re: Proper breakthroughs/inventions."
- Previous message: Haris: "Re: AT89C2051 trigering relay problem"
- In reply to: Tony: "Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Next in thread: sPoNiX: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Reply: sPoNiX: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Reply: Tony: "Re: Which flash card interface to design in?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|