Re: digital analog conversion
From: Veronica Matthews (ikeepthespiritalive_at_freenet.de)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Tony Williams: "Re: Testing DC/DC Converters"
- Previous message: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- In reply to: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Next in thread: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Winfield Hill: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Daniel Haude: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:18:54 +0100
"Tilmann Reh" <tilmannreh@despammed.com>:
> It would be nice if you would stop posting this same question over
> and over again in many different groups, while constantly ignoring all
> those answers that were already given.
Wrong, not "over and over again" but in newsgroups that fit the topic. I
won't stop posting my questions just because a Tilmannreh tells me so! ;-)
The other point is that I am actually not ignoring the answers, but come
into discussion with all the people there. Please have a closer look before
you judge people. If you wear glasses, feel free to use them.
In correcting and imposing your will on me I wish you better luck next time!
- Next message: Tony Williams: "Re: Testing DC/DC Converters"
- Previous message: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- In reply to: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Next in thread: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Winfield Hill: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Tilmann Reh: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Reply: Daniel Haude: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]