Re: digital analog conversion
From: Daniel Haude (haude_at_kir.physnet.uni-hamburg.de)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Daniel Haude: "Re: OT: Scott Ridder on Fallujah"
- Previous message: James Meyer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- In reply to: Veronica Matthews: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Nov 2004 13:19:09 GMT
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:18:54 +0100,
Veronica Matthews <ikeepthespiritalive@freenet.de> wrote
in Msg. <cn22q2$6fn$1@news.cs.tu-berlin.de>
> Wrong, not "over and over again" but in newsgroups that fit the topic. I
> won't stop posting my questions just because a Tilmannreh tells me so! ;-)
> The other point is that I am actually not ignoring the answers, but come
> into discussion with all the people there.
It doesn't look like it, considering that the only post in this newsgroup
that you responded to is the only one that gives a non-technical answer.
You need to read up on the topics of both D/A conversion and Usenet.
The only sensible solution to your problem is to store the digital value,
not the analog one, like already suggested by John P.
--Daniel
- Next message: Daniel Haude: "Re: OT: Scott Ridder on Fallujah"
- Previous message: James Meyer: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- In reply to: Veronica Matthews: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: digital analog conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]