Re: Vocabulary rag was Re: Operational Amplifier Design
From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: Frank Birbacher: "Re: concrete plans for pwm"
- Previous message: David Harper: "Effects of vibration on capacitors"
- In reply to: Rich The Philosophizer: "OT: Vocabulary rag was Re: Operational Amplifier Design"
- Next in thread: Winfield Hill: "Re: Operational Amplifier Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:26:13 GMT
Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:53:52 +0000, Kevin Aylward wrote:
>
>> Clifford Heath wrote:
>>> Kevin Aylward wrote:
>>>> I, usually, always cover my arse. As indeed I do here wth the word
>>>> "usually".
>>>
>>> You should afford others the right to cover themselves in the same
>>> way.
>>
>> I usually do:-)
>>
>> When I read anything, I have "Yes-Minister" to mind. Is what is being
>> said in code.
>>
>
> You are aware, of course, (aren't you?) that "Is what is being said in
> code" not only is not a sentence, but has no referent in context, and
> wouldn't mean anything even if it were/did?
Yes it does, its in code:-)
Put a , after the said.
Remeber the "Oscillators don't, amplifiers do"?
Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
- Next message: Frank Birbacher: "Re: concrete plans for pwm"
- Previous message: David Harper: "Effects of vibration on capacitors"
- In reply to: Rich The Philosophizer: "OT: Vocabulary rag was Re: Operational Amplifier Design"
- Next in thread: Winfield Hill: "Re: Operational Amplifier Design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]