Re: diode-connected transistors
From: Pooh Bear (rabbitsfriendsandrelations_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/16/04
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Neural nets are electronic, aren't they?"
- Previous message: John Smith: "Re: 4 Watt transmitter question"
- In reply to: Terry Given: "diode-connected transistors"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Reply: Terry Given: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:06:40 +0000
Terry Given wrote:
> I often use diode-connected npn and pnp transistors. Sometimes I use the
> base-emitter junction reverse-breakdown as a (somewhat dodgy) zener,
I believe at's actually avalanche breakdown.
>
> sometimes I use them as diodes. When used as a diode, I can either use
> the c-b junction (b shorted to e) or the b-e junction (b shorted to c).
>
> Here are my questions:
> 1. Which configuration has the lowest capacitance ?
> 2. which configuration has the lowest leakage current?
>
> In a more general sense, what are the pros and cons of either
> connection? Using say bc547 and bc557 transistors.
Can't think of a good reason to do it to be honest, although I've used the
b-e junction to measure temperature ( because TO-220 devices are easy to
mount in a thermally meaningful way ).
Graham
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Neural nets are electronic, aren't they?"
- Previous message: John Smith: "Re: 4 Watt transmitter question"
- In reply to: Terry Given: "diode-connected transistors"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Reply: Terry Given: "Re: diode-connected transistors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|