Re: Low Power portable FM transmitter

From: John Fields (jfields_at_austininstruments.com)
Date: 11/17/04 

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:56:07 -0600

On 17 Nov 2004 08:04:41 -0800, jtspang@gmail.com (jtspang) wrote:

>John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:<3l4lp09jfg1stc7cnesrcofiopcfasol1o@4ax.com>...
>
>> Hey, ***, if you're so hot for that little piece of technology get
>> yourself down to your nearest public library and hit the books. Or
>> get off your lazy, self-indulgent ass and find a website with how to
>> do it on it.
>>
>> As you were told before, nobody here owes you a goddam thing, so if
>> you have a problem with that, piss off.
>>
>> Get a fucking clue; nobody wants to help your sorry ass because you're
>> an irresponsible twat who hasn't the slightest concern for the rights
>> of others.
>
>
>Dear god (From your posts I assume that's how you want to be
>addressed), 

---
Capitalize, please.
---
 
>I am looking other places, however, I find you get better answers by
>asking more than one source.  
---
Not necessarily; all you get is, possibly, more answers.  The quality
of the information you receive has little to do with the quantity of
information received.  You, however, are between a rock and a hard
place because you can't differentiate between good information and
bad. 
  
>If I could find a website that had the circuit I'm looking for, 
>I wouldn't have posted in the first place.
---
I suspect that had you accessed a website with precisely the circuit
you needed, you wouldn't have known it and would have eventually wound
up here asking "Will this work?"
---
  
>But I decided, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel, 
---
Don't be absurd.  If you knew how to "reinvent the wheel" in the first
place, you would have just built your little machine and been on your
merry way, playing "mobile DJ"  for your entourage of idiots and
polluting that 1000' circle, with no one the wiser except the traffic
around you.  As it is, you've been reduced to begging for you what you
want and defending your position for wanting it over and over again,
to no avail.
--- 
 
>maybe someone else has already done what I'm trying to do.  I'll just ask.
>Can't hurt, right? 
---
So far, the only one who's been hurt in this exchange is you, so if
that doesn't matter then you're right.
---
>Surely the good people at sci.electronics.design can
>tell me what I need to know.  
---
You clearly don't _need_ to know, you _want_ to know, and Mick sez you
can't always get what you want.
---
>And some of them can.
---
Certainly some of us _can_ tell you, but just because we can doesn't
mean we _have_ to.  It's up to our individual discretion whether we do
or not, and so far it looks like you're pissing in the wind.
---
>Those of you who
>have avoided the thread but emailed me some ideas, I appreciate it.
---
Perhaps you do, but judging from the fact that you're back I'd say you
either didn't get much help or what you did get was beyond you.
---
>I posted here because I thought that it was a forum where maybe someone
>who knows about this stuff could point me in the right direction.  I
>can see that I was mistaken about that.  
---
You're mistaken about being mistaken about that.  The _good_ advice
you got was to get a Mr. Microphone and adapt that to your needs.
Another piece of good advice you got was to read Part 15 of the FCC
rules and regs, and yet another piece of advice was to abandon the
"project", none of which you elected to follow as evidenced by the
fact that you're back again whining about that everybody's being sooo
mean to you, poor baby...
---
>Why impart any knowledge when you can lecture.  
---
Lecturing _is_ imparting knowledge, at least to those who care to
listen.  What you want is _information_, a totally different thing.
---
 
>How does what I want impune your rights?
---
It's "Impugn", and your desire to break the law for your own
convenience challenges as false my right to believe that the law
applies to you in the same measure as it applies to all of us. 
Look it up.     
>FYI - where I live, that section of the FM band is empty.
---
So what?  The non-empty parts of the band where you live were also
empty once.  Then some folks who wanted to use part of _our_ spectrum
got a license to do so, and are now legally on the air.  Follow their
good example.
--- 
>Hey dip***, how much of your company's time do you piss away 
>listening to static?  
---
So far, about ten or fifteen minutes reading your crap.
---
>And where have I said that anyone owes me anything?  
---
Your attitude and your refusal to want to abide by the FCC's rules
indicates that you feel you've got something coming back to you, i.e.
you're holding a debt of some kind over someones head and calling in
the note.
---
  
>Disregard my first post, if that will assuage your guilt over aiding 
>someone in -holy ***!- violating the letter of the FCC code.  
---
I'm not going do to anything to help you violate anything in the
slightest, so you can take your sophomoric posturing and stick it up
your ass.
---
 
>You must be a lawyer, because only a lawyer could be so narrow-minded, 
>seeing only problems, no solutions. 
---
The solution is for you to stop being the problem. Get with the
program, twerp, or get off the boat.
---
>IT'S JUST A SHITTLY LITTLE CAR TRANSMITTER! 
---
Yes, I'm sure it would be a real POS if you ever got it off the
ground.
---
>So I say again, keep your small minded criticisms to yourself, and kiss my ass.
---
So _you_ say again?  Geez, you must be _important_ or something...
FYI, moron, I'll do exactly what I please, including criticise you if
that strikes my fancy, and if you don't like it I suggest you go get a
little attitude adjustment.
-- 
John Fields
Quantcast