Re: OT: Has anybody noticed recently that Rene DesCartes doesn't actually exist?
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: dB: "Re: Ohms Law - NOT"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: OT: Is this as "profound" as it sounds to me?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Pig Bladder: "OT: Has anybody noticed recently that Rene DesCartes doesn't actually exist?"
- Next in thread: James Meyer: "Re: OT: Has anybody noticed recently that Rene DesCartes doesn't actually exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:10:38 +0000
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:09:10 GMT, Pig Bladder
<pig_bladder@anyspammer.org> wrote:
>Maybe at one time, he thought he did, but just because you think you exist
>doesn't mean that you actually do exist.
>
>I know I exist, because I can feel it. Senseo ergo sum cognosco.
I'm pink, therefore I'm spam.
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: dB: "Re: Ohms Law - NOT"
- Previous message: Paul Burridge: "Re: OT: Is this as "profound" as it sounds to me?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Pig Bladder: "OT: Has anybody noticed recently that Rene DesCartes doesn't actually exist?"
- Next in thread: James Meyer: "Re: OT: Has anybody noticed recently that Rene DesCartes doesn't actually exist?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
