Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??
From: Rolavine (rolavine_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Jim Yanik: "Re: Solder like glue ?"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: OT: Howcome Drew Carey is still getting paid?"
- In reply to: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Next in thread: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Reply: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Reply: Sound Friend: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Nov 2004 00:35:50 GMT
>Subject: Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??
>From: "~~ VerilogMan ~~" Zoroxeus@yahoo.com
>Date: 11/23/04 3:32 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <AoCdnQRYwNLEVT7cRVn-sw@rogers.com>
>
>"SQLit" <SQLitnospam@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:4rPod.340287$a85.10747@fed1read04...
>>
>> "~~ VerilogMan ~~" <zoroux7@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> news:R-CdneomhMyRLD7cRVn-3Q@rogers.com...
>>> Hello,
>>> I am thinking of buiying this graphic display.
>>> http://www.crystalfontz.com/products/12864cp/index.html#CFAX12864CP1WGHTS
>>> It has a 4 analog I/O for the touch screen, and 18 I/O (the
>>> specidications
>>> are on the link "Data Sheet")
>>> I have a VERY hard time trying to figure the best microcontroller to
>>> interface it with a desktop computer on the serial port.
>>> If you could take a look at http://dkc1.digikey.com/CA/PDF/C043/P4.html
>>> (Microcontrollers section) and tell me wich one is the easiest / most
>>> efficient, i would appreciate big time !
>>> Thanks guys!
>>>
>>
>> So what are you going to use it for? Pretty hard to help with this kind
>> of
>> information.
>>
>>
>
>Ok , the microcontroller should interpret the touch on the screen and also
>receive infos from the computer through the RS232 port
>It's just an Graphic display, and it is touch screen. So pretty much it is
>to send the places where it has been touched to the computer, and send the
>infos to be displayed from the computer..
>
It's hard to go wrong with the PIC's, the PIC18F series is great, however you
would need a programmer like the ICD2 to work with it efficiently. Microchip
and Atmel provide great free tools for assembly language, however if you want a
c compiler the good ones cost money. If want C and can live with some
restrictions, I think you could do your project using the TI 420 chips, and
they have a cheap starter that comes with C. Another choice is using the Rabbit
Chips.
I know not much help, but just about any of the chips can do your intended
function, so asking how you want to create the software is a good distinction.
I checked and can see that the PIC and Atmel clocked serial modes will work
with that display, that beats bit banging it out I don't know much about the TI
chips as I have never used them.
Rocky
- Next message: Jim Yanik: "Re: Solder like glue ?"
- Previous message: John Fields: "Re: OT: Howcome Drew Carey is still getting paid?"
- In reply to: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Next in thread: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Reply: ~~ VerilogMan ~~: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Reply: Sound Friend: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|