Re: Damm Small Linux
From: Joel Kolstad (JKolstad71HatesSpam_at_Yahoo.Com)
Date: 11/27/04
- Next message: Joel Kolstad: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- In reply to: Robert Baer: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: classd101: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:47:50 -0800
"Robert Baer" <robertbaer@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41A7EFC2.3152EF15@earthlink.net...
> Exactly. QNX appears to be the only OS that is bug-free and crashless.
It's a lot easier to keep a 40kB kernel bug free than one that's tens?
hundreds? of megabytes as Windows, Linux, etc. are these days. The bigger
OSes provide more features of course, but in many applications you may not
need them. Moral of the story: Don't buy a bigger OS than you need?
- Next message: Joel Kolstad: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- In reply to: Robert Baer: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Next in thread: Rich Grise: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Rich Grise: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: classd101: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]