Re: Damm Small Linux
From: Chaos Master (renan.birckDEADTOTHESPAMMER_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/28/04
- Previous message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- In reply to: classd101: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:23:38 -0200
classd101 lies inside himself for hours:
> I'm suffering from the bloated OS syndrom at this very moment. My hard
> drive (Fujitsu) was a lemon thanks to a faulty batch of Cirrus Logic
> ICs, and it went the other day. So I installed XP on my old 6GB back
> up drive. XP alone takes up half of it!! If I recall correctly, win9X
> would take up ~260MB, and could be stripped to 180MB. I could run it
> dual boot with Linux on the same drive and have all my programs
> installed. I can't believe that now. So what does one replace a dead
> 40GB drive with? A 160GB drive, of course.
I think that you can use 'XPLite' to remove XP stuff.
Also remove dead things, like Windows Messenger. (MS attempt at forcing
MSN into everybody).
I have Win 98 SE installed in 200MB. My total disk usage by software is
~500MB.
> So what came first? Was it the faster/higher capacity hardware or the
> bloated software?
The faster hardware moved manufacturers into making more bloated
software.
--
Chaos Master®, posting from somewhere near Porto Alegre, Brazil.
"... one either has a ***, or not. Do you have yours?"
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
http://marreka.blogspot.com --> news, hotter than high-power
transistors!
To reply remove "DEADTOTHESPAMMER" from address.
- Previous message: Dave VanHorn: "Re: Microcontroller ... which one ??"
- In reply to: classd101: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Next in thread: Guy Macon: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Reply: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Damm Small Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]