Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?
From: Jonathan Kirwan (jkirwan_at_easystreet.com)
Date: 12/01/04
- Next message: Payman Habibelahi: "Tektronix TDS350 PSU"
- Previous message: mike: "Re: Software for a beginner to design and learn about circuits with?"
- In reply to: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Next in thread: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Reply: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Reply: Active8: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:34:18 GMT
On 1 Dec 2004 01:58:12 -0800, "lemonjuice" <exskimos@anonymous.to> wrote:
><snip>
>I posted my results earlier on this thread and I showed how you can use
>beta. As a matter of fact it seems there is no way of including
>the base and source resistances and hence getting a more accurate
>result without including beta.
I saw a post of a spice simulation, with you saying: "I got 193 closer to the
spice simulation value." Later, I think, I also saw an expression without
derivation or basis, so I wasn't able to check your thinking. That's where I'm
at with what you wrote. I believe I exposed my thinking quite clearly, in
contrast.
Jon
- Next message: Payman Habibelahi: "Tektronix TDS350 PSU"
- Previous message: mike: "Re: Software for a beginner to design and learn about circuits with?"
- In reply to: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Next in thread: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Reply: lemonjuice: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Reply: Active8: "Re: FETs Vesus Bipolars, Why More Efficient?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]