Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?
From: Tim Shoppa (shoppa_at_trailing-edge.com)
Date: 12/01/04
- Next message: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Web site for bidding"
- Previous message: JJFox: "Linex/Mobile-BLK-BX-USB-FM TX...Anyone Manage To Drop The Freq Range Yet ?"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Next in thread: Ken: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Reply: Ken: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Dec 2004 07:48:48 -0800
Winfield Hill <hill_a@t_rowland-dotties-harvard-dot.s-edu> wrote in message news:<coisj00l0a@drn.newsguy.com>...
> JeffM wrote...
> >
> >> when this stuff was invented
> >
> > Yup. Stroger Switches were invented in 1884--by an undertaker.
>
> Do you think they used -48V back then?
It was less standardized. Short loops were as little as -12V, long
loops could be more than -48V. It depended on who was selling the
switch and equipment too.
Large parts of the civilized world use -24V as the default on telco
loops.
Tim.
- Next message: Nicholas O. Lindan: "Re: Web site for bidding"
- Previous message: JJFox: "Linex/Mobile-BLK-BX-USB-FM TX...Anyone Manage To Drop The Freq Range Yet ?"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Next in thread: Ken: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Reply: Ken: "Re: Why -48V for telephone lines, and not positive?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|