Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us
radio913_at_aol.com
Date: 12/08/04
- Next message: ChrisGibboGibson: "Re: Cuk converter bizzare control loop"
- Previous message: radio913_at_aol.com: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Dec 2004 16:14:54 -0800
Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> gm = Ie*q/(kT)
>
> or
>
> re = kT/q/Ie
>
> No Is to be seen ;-)
>
They should actually call
this the Shockley emitter TRANS-resistance,
instead of just resistance.
After all, we are just inverting the
transconductance.
Slick
- Next message: ChrisGibboGibson: "Re: Cuk converter bizzare control loop"
- Previous message: radio913_at_aol.com: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: BJT transistor beta, vs Ebers-Moll, Gummel-Poon, and the other tools God has given us"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
