Re: Not Impressed with this New Format
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 12/12/04
- Next message: James Sweet: "Re: [FA:] Triple decker substitution box"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: ultra low current measurement"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:34:38 +0000
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:18:20 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:
>On 11 Dec 2004 10:41:03 -0800, chemelec@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>I find this a real waste of space, compared to the older one.
>>If this is whats to come, I'm out of here for good.
>
>
>Bye!
I don't think you know who you're dissin' here, John. This guy is a
great designer and a real mine of useful info on the more exotic
aspects of electronics.
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: James Sweet: "Re: [FA:] Triple decker substitution box"
- Previous message: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: ultra low current measurement"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Reply: John Larkin: "Re: Not Impressed with this New Format"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]