Re: Christmas vs "Holidays"
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Previous message: Rolavine: "Re: OT: A Letter To President Bush (political satire)"
- In reply to: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Next in thread: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Reply: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Reply: Diane James: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 06:45:56 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that James A. Doemer
<jdjunkmail@earthlink.net> wrote (in <T7Jwd.2151$9j5.1546@newsread3.news
.pas.earthlink.net>) about 'Christmas vs "Holidays"', on Fri, 17 Dec
2004:
>
>"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
>news:oswf9fCVJuwBFw48@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
>> I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
>> <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <X7Bwd.738$Qo4.124@fe1.news.bluey
>> onder.co.uk>) about 'Christmas vs "Holidays"', on Fri, 17 Dec 2004:
>>
>> >So, Paul (if he existed) died, and no one
>> >noticed.
>>
>> There IS reliable independent evidence that Paul existed.
>
>Such as?
>
>
Go look. I don't have to spoon-feed you with information.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Previous message: Rolavine: "Re: OT: A Letter To President Bush (political satire)"
- In reply to: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Next in thread: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Reply: James A. Doemer: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Reply: Diane James: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|