Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?
From: John Fields (jfields_at_austininstruments.com)
Date: 12/19/04
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT: Quiz - more suggestions?"
- In reply to: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Next in thread: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Reply: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Reply: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:19:08 -0600
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:47:42 GMT, "Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote:
>Jeff Wisnia wrote:
>> Today I encountered something that is either stupid design or I've
>> somehow missed the point.
>>
>> While out shopping last night I found some nice looking flourescent
>> torchiere lamps on sale at a very attractive price. They had the usual
>> pair of "circline" flourescent bulbs and a switch for three light
>> levels. I decided it was time to pick up a couple and get rid of the
>> ancient 300 watt halogen ones (Pre safety guard models even.) sitting
>> around in two spare bedrooms. I had creepy feelings about some
>> uninformed guest drying out damp clothing by hanging it over a lit
>> halogen and starting a holocoust.
>>
>> I got 'em home, assembled them and was pleased with the results.
>>
>> This morning I went to move one and noticed that even though it had
>> been off all night, the electronic ballast, which was located topside
>> in the center of the bulbs, was noticably warm. I put my hand over
>> the other lamp's ballast and it too was warm.
>>
>> I took one down to my workshop and measured its current draw with the
>> lamp off. It was a bit over 9 watts. It appears that the ballast is
>> powered up continuously and there's a couple of control lines which
>> get diddled by the switch on the lamp's column to make the bulbs turn
>> on.
>> I've got a couple of other flourescent torchiers in the house which
>> switch line power ahead of the ballast as I'd expect.
>>
>> As we're paying close to 10 cents a KWH for electricity these days,
>> I'm not amused by the thought of paying around $15 a year for the
>> priviledge of keeping those two "energy saving" lamps plugged in, nor
>> do I want to go to the bother of unplugging them when they're not
>> going to be used or installing and wiring wall switches to control
>> the outlets they are plugged into.
>>
>> Those stupid lamps were returned to the store today, I'll go get ones
>> next week which don't waste my money when they aren't in use.
>>
>> Am I missing a reason why those lamps were designed that way other
>> than it may have enabled the manufacturer to save a few pennies on
>> each one?
>
>If the lamps would use 9W they would be *very* hot, I suspect the most
>current is not "real" in phase with the voltage, but imaginary as some
>capacitive or inductive load. I would guess 1-2W as you descibe it, much
>like the small low voltage xformers when idle. You cannot measure the power
>consumption with an amperemeter, even if it is true rms, but you need a
>dedicated power meter for it with 3connections at least.
--- You can do it with an oscilloscope and a resistive shunt to measure the current. Display voltage on one channel, current on the other, determine the phase angle between them and then P = IE cos(phi). You could also do it with a current transformer once you've determined its primary-to-secondary phase shift. -- John Fields
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: Christmas vs "Holidays""
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT: Quiz - more suggestions?"
- In reply to: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Next in thread: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Reply: Ban: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Reply: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: Flourescent lamp -Wasting Power?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|