Re: right hand rule
From: Jamie Morken (jmorken_at_shaw.ca)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- Previous message: Roy Lewallen: "Re: Tektronix 465 Scope"
- In reply to: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: right hand rule"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: right hand rule"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 01:20:08 GMT
Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:16:25 +0100, Rene Tschaggelar wrote:
>
>
>>Kevin Aylward wrote:
>>
>>>Phil Hobbs wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The mystery is why there are no magnetic monopoles
>>>
>>>I don't personally see this as a mystery. Why should there be two
>>>methods associated with E&M? Magnetic fields are simply electric fields
>>>viewed from another reference frame. Electric fields are just the
>>>manifestation of photon momentum exchange between charges. So, why
>>>should there be magnetic monopoles?
>>
>>Naa. While a dynamic H and E field can be changed into the
>>other by looking from another reference, this is not true
>>for static E or H fields. This means a static H field doesn't
>>become a pure E field at "whatever" speed. "Whatever" in this
>>context means anything between minus c and plus c.
>
>
> The "magnetic line of force" is always a circle. The only way to
> break the circle and actually make it break, rather than just
> distort fractally, is to spawn a whole nother loop. Of course,
> each loop has to have its own current to hold it open. Or,
> maybe, instead of having to be a current, there could be a piece of
> charge oscillating up and down inside of it, while, 90deg. out of phase,
> the loop expands and contracts.
>
Sounds like you are talking about this:
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Images/Spherical-In-Wave-An.gif
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Images/Spherical-Out-Wave-An.gif
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Images/Spherical-Standing-Wave-An.gif
"Figure 1. The Electron. The electron is composed of spherical waves
which converge to the center and then become outward waves. The two
waves form a standing wave whose peaks and nodes are like the layers of
an onion. The wave amplitude is a scalar number like a quantum wave, not
an electromagnetic vector wave (a mathematical wave of force). The
Wave-Center is the apparent location of the electron 'particle'."
from: "http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Wave-Structure-Matter.htm"
also: "http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm"
Still don't know if any of this has anything to do with the "right hand
rule"? ;)
cheers,
Jamie
> I wonder if that's what an electron of photon might be like in
> the Basic Integrated Grandiose Theory Of Everything, or BIGTOE?
>
> ;^j
> Rich
>
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- Previous message: Roy Lewallen: "Re: Tektronix 465 Scope"
- In reply to: Rich The Philosophizer: "Re: right hand rule"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: right hand rule"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|