Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed.
From: Winfield Hill (hill_a_at_t_rowland-dotties-harvard-dot.s-edu)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Winfield Hill: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Previous message: Mike Monett: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Reply: richard mullens: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Dec 2004 18:34:41 -0800
Jonathan Kirwan wrote...
>
> Guy Macon wrote:
>
>> Please make sure that the binding is as good as the last edition.
>> I have seen other technical books cheapen up the binding, and AoE
>> is a reference that I use a *lot*.
>
> Better than... Both my 1st and 2nd editions have broken spines and
> I treated them reasonably well -- just a lot of opening and closing.
Right. We told our publishers the binding needs to be improved. But
they were surprised; apparently most books don't get such heavy use.
--
Thanks,
- Win
- Next message: Winfield Hill: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Previous message: Mike Monett: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Reply: richard mullens: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]