Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed.
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: aestryker_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Batteries for school project"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Next in thread: xray: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:16:55 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Winfield Hill <hill_a@t_rowland-
dotties-harvard-dot.s-edu> wrote (in <cqfv8102hmk@drn.newsguy.com>)
about 'Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed.', on Thu, 23 Dec 2004:
>Right. We told our publishers the binding needs to be improved. But
> they were surprised; apparently most books don't get such heavy use.
>
You have to allow for it to be thrown at the wall (or the boss) when
even its sage advice doesn't solve the problem. (;-)
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: aestryker_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Batteries for school project"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Horowitz-Hill: Serious scholarly query"
- In reply to: Winfield Hill: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Next in thread: xray: "Re: Suggestions for AoE 3rd Ed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
