Re: Decline of E+WW

From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax (dirk_at_neopax.com)
Date: 01/06/05 

Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:34:08 +0000

Mike Harrison wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:48:48 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan@easystreet.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:55:47 GMT, Rich The Philosophizer <rtp@example.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.godchannel.com
>>>
>>>It has all of the answers.
>
>
> Jeez - it's the 21's century FFS. Isn't it time we moved on from all this religion nonsense....?

Right.
And to explain a brick all we need is eleven dimensions and an infinite number
of universes. 

-- 
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Decline of E+WW
    ... >> And to explain a brick all we need is eleven dimensions and an infinite ... >> number of universes. ... > Which I have less problem believing than supernatural being. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Skolems Paradox and why is math the way it is?
    ... The mass/charge ratio is not the mass ratio of the proton and ... infinite universe. ... > dimensions, but the status quo has that it is toroidal in four ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Skolems Paradox and why is math the way it is?
    ... The mass/charge ratio is not the mass ratio of the proton and ... infinite universe. ... > dimensions, but the status quo has that it is toroidal in four ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT: Many Worlds Probability Problem
    ... >> they noticed that some physical constants have an infinite number of ... physical constants could make DNA-based life impossible, ... > random universes plus Anthropic principle (we wouldn't be here to ... So in the case of an infinite multiverse that determines the certainty ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: An infinite number question
    ... >> Raymond Griffith wrote: ... the probability of any particular numerical value being chosen ... >> infinite number of past universes, ...
    (talk.origins)