Re: OT: Safe Riddles
From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: 01/06/05
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: Any AD converter IC suggests ?"
- Previous message: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Decline of E+WW"
- In reply to: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Next in thread: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:33:37 GMT
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:06:32 -0600, Rhyanon wrote:
> Top posting rocks; one can conveniently folow up a reply, at least for
> someone actually has the mental acumen to keep track of what's being said.
Convenient != appropriate.
> Easier to top post without scrolling through five hundred lines of
> rehash.
Failure to trim quoted material is the real problem, and bottom posting
is not much better than top posting (especially when combined with
failure to trim). Interleaving replies amongst trimmed material is
appropriate.
> Oh, and it riles anal retentive dipshits, as an added bonus. You
> know what else I like to do? Add LOTS of sigs.
Yeah, yeah. Followup set.
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: Any AD converter IC suggests ?"
- Previous message: Dirk Bruere at Neopax: "Re: Decline of E+WW"
- In reply to: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Next in thread: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Parse Tree: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Reply: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading