Re: Charcoal Toroid?
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Pat Ford: "Re: OT: Why Pot Is Better Than Alcohol"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Instantaneous (analogue) compression of speech signals"
- In reply to: martin griffith: "Re: Charcoal Toroid?"
- Next in thread: Mike Fields: "Re: Charcoal Toroid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:15:42 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith
<martingriffith@yahoo.co.uk> wrote (in <rel4u0tph15chvabtabamgd9378rtual
5q@4ax.com>) about 'Charcoal Toroid?', on Mon, 10 Jan 2005:
>Hmm, on a more serious note I see from rec.audio.pro that Monster are
>suing any one who uses "monster " to descibe their product.Not a nice
>company, and their products are of dubious quality anyway
Monstrous! It's a dictionary word; difficult stop people using it.
Besides, they aren't real monsters themselves; I looked in the airing
cupboard and they aren't in there.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Pat Ford: "Re: OT: Why Pot Is Better Than Alcohol"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: Instantaneous (analogue) compression of speech signals"
- In reply to: martin griffith: "Re: Charcoal Toroid?"
- Next in thread: Mike Fields: "Re: Charcoal Toroid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
