Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled
unoriginal_username_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/14/05
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: how to switch between 2 batteries?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) xray: "OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Reply: Rolavine: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jan 2005 16:17:33 -0800
I kept telling people more than a year in advance that invasion was a
decision already made by a political and egotistically motivated (not
oil) goverment, that the WMD lies were manufactured as an excuse. I
remember out of perhaps 40 or 45 so-called "educated" people, there
were only 4 or so of us who stood our ground, and one of those was a
patsy who refused to participate in the dicussion. I bet those same 40
people today would absolutely refuse to acknowledge they were wrong.
Dumb asses. It's too bad some of them didn't go over there to fight.
They could have learned the true meaning of objectivity from the scary
end of a bullet. I'm just glad it wasn't a straight slaughter, that we
did not get the "difficult but necessary job over with quickly", as
some of these mindless morons had hoped for. Each time an American
soldier is killed, it is a sad day, but at least this way, the mother
and fathers of those soldiers will take a more serious look at death
and the necessity of it. And now, the embiciles realize that there is
far more to this than a bunch of poor people being opprossed by another
man with a dark mustache and nice boots. Not surprisingly, many of
them don't have an opinion on the matter. With Sadam deposed and
fighting persisting with surprising ferocity, they are confused. It's
funny to watch them watch the TV now. They want to call them
terrorists, but the media calls them insurgients or militants. LOL!
"Ok...explain to me again, why are they still mad? Sadam is gone.."
How could you tell the WMD stuff was a big lie? Simple: Turn on the TV
while Bush and cronies speak with your head turned away and count the
number of times they use the word WMD within 5 minutes of reporter
questioning. It is incredible. ***Anytime*** someone reiterates a
word over and over, you should look around the room slowly for some
idiot with stars in his eyes being programmed. In this case, there was
perhaps a couple of hundred million idiots believing that non-sense. I
remember at one point someone tried to divert from the very carefully
chosen term "WMD" and inject the word "nuclear" until they were
abruptly reminded that you need a small city to diffuse uranium
tetraflouride, and even if you bought enriched uranium, it's not like
you go out and put it in the missile and shut the door and press a
launch button.
As expected, after the invasion, Bush changed the justification to
something irrefutable, knowing that, once you get the head in, she will
probably let you slide in the shaft all the way if you distract her
with soothing banter while you're doing it. Fait accompli.
-Chaud Lapin-
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: how to switch between 2 batteries?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) xray: "OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Reply: Rolavine: "Re: OT: Systematic Lies now cancelled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]