Re: GOTO's

From: John Fields (jfields_at_austininstruments.com)
Date: 01/18/05 

Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:53:49 -0600

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:36:33 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

>
>GOTO's are a positive menace. Any language which allows them is a disgrace
>to mankind's considerable acheivements in that direction. 

---
Assembler with no labels?  What a concept!
-- 
John Fields

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GOTOs
    ... Any language which allows them is a disgrace ... >>to mankind's considerable acheivements in that direction. ... >Assembler with no labels? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: when to use proc
    ... > Here's what I understand about your macros. ... * RosAsm is a PE Assembler and PEs are 32 Bits. ... Simply A86-like Local Labels. ... wrote that MASM does not output what you write... ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: This Crashes RosAsm
    ... > RosAsm can, of course and evidently hold any number ... > of the actual Assembler. ... > labels in a very effective manner. ... > * In case MASM would compile such a list of Labels ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Why RosAsm Breaks on a large number of symbols
    ... "wolfgang kern" écrivait news:cc9386$12p$1 ... >| ...But as long as you don't fix the bugs in your assembler, ... > to change a single bit in RosAsm in due of it. ... wrong with his stupid labels List, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Weird 8051 assembler code generated by SDCC
    ... statement which has some in-line assembler code in several spots. ... easier to generate temporary labels. ... probably) is terminating the range of the compiler generated ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)