Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash...
From: Guy Macon (_see.web.page__at__www.guymacon.com_)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Sub for BC549C"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: Unbenchworthy"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Next in thread: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Reply: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:50:45 +0000
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
>>Surely you are able to state what argument you found to be unsound.
>
>I could. But I'd like to know what you feel is sound about it.
Asked and answered. "I have checked many of the references and
confirmed that they say what is claimed. I have done the math
and it appears to be correct. I have analysed the logic of
the arguments and they appear to be sound."
- Next message: John Woodgate: "Re: Sub for BC549C"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: Unbenchworthy"
- In reply to: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Next in thread: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Reply: Jonathan Kirwan: "Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|