Re: Peterson's Death Sentence
uvcceet_at_juno.com
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: GOTO's"
- Previous message: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Maybe in reply to: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:06:11 -0700
In <41efc801$1$woehfu$mr2ice@news.aros.net>, on 01/20/05
at 07:57 AM, uvcceet@juno.com said:
>In <3595jsF4j4g2sU3@individual.net>, on 01/20/05
> at 02:40 AM, "Aunty Kreist" <Aunty_Kreist@satanickittens.net> said: >>
>>> If killing an unborn child is not murder, how come scotty boy is gonna
>die >> for doing it?
>>Um....because he also killed the human the fetus was attached to.
>Uh, no. The death penalty was imposed because he committed TWO murders.
>If the baby inside his wife had not been killed, or was not considered to
>be a living being, they jury could not have imposed the death sentence.
>So we can see, that it is murder to kill a baby inside the mother. When
>is it a baby? Go ahead and argue that one for the rest of your life.
>Logic will answer that question to anyone who really considers it.
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: GOTO's"
- Previous message: Rhyanon: "Re: OT: Safe Riddles"
- Maybe in reply to: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Aunty Kreist: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
