Re: Peterson's Death Sentence
From: Parse Tree (account_at_domain.extension)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: Parse Tree: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:10:15 GMT
John Woodgate wrote:
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Parse Tree
> <account@domain.extension> wrote (in <pMyJd.7746$ju.1113@news.easynews.c
> om>) about 'Peterson's Death Sentence', on Tue, 25 Jan 2005:
>
>
>>None of these comments could in any way alter the fact that God is
>>logically impossible, and therefore logically proven to not exist.
>
> All your proof says is that a universal creator cannot be bound by rules
> of logic. It isn't a non-existence proof.
Actually, that's exactly what it is. If something cannot exist in logic,
then it logically does not exist.
Proof by contradiction is very common in logic and mathematics.
> There are games of tick-tack-toe (see, I can write in American!) that,
> when analysed logically, result in the need to put both an O and an X in
> the centre square to finish the game, and this is clearly impossible
> according to the rules. But that doesn't mean that tick-tack-toe doesn't
> exist!
I think this whole segment was meaningless, and I'd like for you to
provide such an example of tic-tac-toe.
- Next message: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Previous message: Parse Tree: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- In reply to: John Woodgate: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Noah Roberts: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|