Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections
From: Clarence_A (no_at_No.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Clarence_A: "Re: Is microprocessor an integrated circuit???"
- Previous message: Keith Williams: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- In reply to: richard mullens: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:42:57 GMT
"richard mullens" <mullensdeletethis@ntlworld.com> wrote in
message news:ccqLd.393$JG.390@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
> John Woodgate wrote:
<snip>
> >
> I think that its case of "the end doesn't justify the means" -
and that is only if you believe that democracy for the Shiites
> was the original purpose (which of course we all know it
wasn't).
The assumption that you have any clue about the purpose of the
freeing of Iraq is laughable. "WE" all seem to have different
views depending on things and stories about the action that have
nothing at all to do with the "reasons" or the plans to free Iraq
and eliminate Sadam's regime!
> No doubt the Iraqis will be only too pleased when (if) they rid
themselves of the cursed coalition invader and of all the chaos
> he has created.
Rid? The Coalition will withdraw as soon as the situation is
stable with an elected government in control. The people of Iraq
are aware of it, and like anyone else, and uncomfortable in a
condition of flux between "was" and "will be" in their world.
Rather like the victims of the tsunami.
- Next message: Clarence_A: "Re: Is microprocessor an integrated circuit???"
- Previous message: Keith Williams: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- In reply to: richard mullens: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]