Re: Peterson's Death Sentence
From: John Fields (jfields_at_austininstruments.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Mark Jones: "Re: Help about El Cheapo PICmicro Programmer"
- Previous message: mully: "Re: Source for Helmholtz Coils"
- Maybe in reply to: Parse Tree: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Keith Williams: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Keith Williams: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:59:07 -0600
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:18:01 -0500, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:51:22 -0600, John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:19:42 +0000 (UTC), Willem <willem@stack.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>John wrote:
>>>) Agreed, but I can't see what that has to do with the original color
>>>) analogy presented other than to further reduce its usefulness.
>>>
>>>It is a simple refutation of your assertion that light comes in discrete
>>>wavelengths only, nothing more. I hereby reassert that colour is a
>>>continuum, and that my analogy is therefore more useful than you want to
>>>believe.
>>
>> ---
>> OK. I agree with you and John Woodgate and Kevin that color is a
>> continuum,
>
>Hmm, why give up on color being a continuum so quickly? If distance and
>time are discrete, why would color be?
--- ??? Why would color _be_, or why would color _not be_? [discrete] -- John Fields
- Next message: Mark Jones: "Re: Help about El Cheapo PICmicro Programmer"
- Previous message: mully: "Re: Source for Helmholtz Coils"
- Maybe in reply to: Parse Tree: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Next in thread: Keith Williams: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Reply: Keith Williams: "Re: Peterson's Death Sentence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
