Re: CE compliance testing in the UK
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 02/01/05
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Grrrrrrr"
- Previous message: lemonjuice: "Re: Common emitter amplifier question (rc || rl)"
- In reply to: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Next in thread: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Reply: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:52:42 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Ian Stirling
<root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote (in <41ffe828$0$7948$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-
reader01.plus.net>) about 'CE compliance testing in the UK', on Tue, 1
Feb 2005:
>In many cases this isn't true.
>Especially with multi-cell batteries, it's usual for some part of the
>electronics to be energised.
Doesn't that discharge the battery? What is it that's energised? If it's
electromagnetically benign, it doesn't matter.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Grrrrrrr"
- Previous message: lemonjuice: "Re: Common emitter amplifier question (rc || rl)"
- In reply to: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Next in thread: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Reply: Ian Stirling: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading