not a bit on-topic
From: John Larkin (jjlarkin_at_highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Emanual Kann: "Re: Albert Einstein"
- Previous message: SQLit: "Re: voltage data logging with a windmill"
- Next in thread: bill.sloman_at_ieee.org: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: bill.sloman_at_ieee.org: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: Tom Del Rosso: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: Michael A. Terrell: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:01:05 -0800
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/09/carly_fiorina_goes/
and even less so:
http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/DickMorris/020905.html
John
- Next message: Emanual Kann: "Re: Albert Einstein"
- Previous message: SQLit: "Re: voltage data logging with a windmill"
- Next in thread: bill.sloman_at_ieee.org: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: bill.sloman_at_ieee.org: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: Tom Del Rosso: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Reply: Michael A. Terrell: "Re: not a bit on-topic"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
