Re: Frequency response of LDRs
From: Joel Kolstad (JKolstad71HatesSpam_at_Yahoo.Com)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: Fritz Schlunder: "Re: Why is the ATX PSU designed to standby current?"
- Previous message: Paul Mathews: "Re: Ac to DC without transformer"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: Frequency response of LDRs"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Frequency response of LDRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:43:10 -0800
Hi Jim,
"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:75vm01pvja84fhjh3ikmdld661pbuuva6v@4ax.com...
> If it's uP-controlled, why not use a ladder of R's switched with
> analog switches?
Since I'm trying to minimize parasitics. This is part of the 'can you build
an active 30MHz filter with a GHz op-amp?' idea.
---Joel
- Next message: Fritz Schlunder: "Re: Why is the ATX PSU designed to standby current?"
- Previous message: Paul Mathews: "Re: Ac to DC without transformer"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: Frequency response of LDRs"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: Frequency response of LDRs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]