Re: Interesting sensor design problem
From: Active8 (reply2group_at_ndbbm.net)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Seismometers and Pickup Coils"
- Previous message: PaulCsouls: "Re: Back to Back Tantalum Caps"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:29:35 -0500
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:11:42 +0000 (UTC), Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <19tokk68vtff$.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net>,
> Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> wrote:
>>How come I could see it wouldn't work without doing the math?
>
> When I do this sort of thing I often try to suggest that it is because I'm
> very smart. About 1 in 3 times my cow-orkers let me get away with it.
Sometimes when I pull a fast one I'll say, "Good thing I'm smart."
That usually elicites a chuckle.
I don't recall seeing any circuits using transistors to make a
better r-r, like you suggest doing with the TIPs. Again, we don't
know what accuracy the OP needs at the endpoints, but how perfect
can we get?
-- Best Regards, Mike
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Seismometers and Pickup Coils"
- Previous message: PaulCsouls: "Re: Back to Back Tantalum Caps"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|