Re: Interesting sensor design problem
From: Active8 (reply2group_at_ndbbm.net)
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: Clarence_A: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Previous message: CWatters: "Re: Heavy Duty Soldering"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:50:52 -0500
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:25:07 +0000 (UTC), Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <luc04q468arn$.dlg@ID-222894.news.individual.net>,
> Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> wrote:
> [...]
>>I don't recall seeing any circuits using transistors to make a
>>better r-r, like you suggest doing with the TIPs. Again, we don't
>>know what accuracy the OP needs at the endpoints, but how perfect
>>can we get?
>
> How much money do you have?
>
> I haven't actually tried the TIP35 but I suspect that you could easily get
> to within 1mV of the rail at a few mA of load current. Using a transistor
> inverted like that gives a quite low saturation voltage.
Where can I find an example of this circuit?
-- Best Regards, Mike
- Next message: Clarence_A: "Re: CE compliance testing in the UK"
- Previous message: CWatters: "Re: Heavy Duty Soldering"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Interesting sensor design problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|