Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links
From: Guy Macon (_see.web.page__at__www.guymacon.com_)
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: Moray Cuthill: "Re: alternator voltage regulator"
- Previous message: mike-nospam_at_darrettenterprises.com: "alternator voltage regulator"
- In reply to: BobG: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Next in thread: keith: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Reply: keith: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:52:11 +0000
BobG wrote:
>Why not send every byte 3 times and take the one that gets received 2
>or 3 times? Of course, that doesnt give much of a clue of what to do if
>you send 3 bytes and get 3 different received bytes.... maybe send 3
>bytes with parity? Yeah... that might work.... 200% overhead, but
>reliable.....
Better to send the entire message three times. Radio interference
tends to come in bursts which would wipe out several bytes in a row.
- Next message: Moray Cuthill: "Re: alternator voltage regulator"
- Previous message: mike-nospam_at_darrettenterprises.com: "alternator voltage regulator"
- In reply to: BobG: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Next in thread: keith: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Reply: keith: "Re: File transfer protocol for Radio Links"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|