Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna
From: Cecil Moore (w5dxp_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: richard mullens: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Previous message: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:56:47 -0600
Ken Smith wrote:
> If you then
> put in the output device protection they didn't include, you end up with
> the matching as I explained elsewhere.
SWR foldback is part of impedance matching?
-- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
- Next message: richard mullens: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- Previous message: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian: "Re: OT: reaction to Iraqi elections"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: 1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
