Re: OT: Why People Are Not Free? (rant)

From: Kryten (kryten_droid_obfusticator_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 03/01/05 

Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:34:20 GMT

"Don Pearce" <donald@pearce.uk.com> wrote in message
news:42275570.14024421@news.plus.net...

> And really - who gives a f*ck whom he marries?
> Neither of them is a friend of mine.

Exactly.

I guess the populace was originally averse to having a queen that other
blokes had used and cast off. But since Charles has already produced heirs
then unless they both die and Camilla is still fertile it is unlikely to be
an issue.

Royalty no longer have any power to dictate the national religion, so it
doesn't matter if they marry or become non-protestant.

Royalty seems to have descended into an upper-class twit reality show funded
from the public purse, providing easy fodder for newspapers and people that
are obsessed with such crap.

The Royals ought to stop taking any money from the public and then they can
rightly say they are not paid to be a public freak show. Then they can tell
the world to mind their own business, and use anti-stalking laws if anyone
tries otherwise.

I wonder what would happen if any heir wanted to marry a non-white Satanist?

That would be damn funny! :->

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
    ... Indeed, if Wills wants to marry within royalty, he'll almost ... trash e.g. Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Simone Warne, Margaret ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
    ... >Europe. ... Indeed, if Wills wants to marry within royalty, he'll almost ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Rambling through Lords in 2005
    ... if Wills wants to marry within ... >> royalty could only marry royalty. ... > Well, if not royalty, within aristocratic circles. ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
Quantcast