Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target
From: Luhan Monat (x_at_y.z)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: hamilton: "Re: seeking graphical LCD with built-in controller"
- Previous message: Luhan Monat: "Re: EEPROM checksum error"
- In reply to: JeffM: "Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:16:23 -0800
JeffM wrote:
> :Since a "shot down" missile would probably land on Canada
> :those Canucks better get started
> :on an "anti-anti-missile-missile" system.
> : Dave
> :
>
>>I just love it when sissies try to talk tough
>>Jim Thompson
>
>
> Yeah, and it facinates me when Hawks talk about "Missle Defense":
>
> *If* the Patriot has ever destroyed a booster,
> http://216.239.63.104/search?q=cache:SEVKodRyajAJ:www.cdi.org/issues/bmd/Patriot.html+Patriot's-intercept-rate+zero-+*-average-*-three-interceptors-*-*-*-*-Scud
> the warhead was left intact to impact near the original target.
>
> The only time those boys can hit something in the South Pacific
> is when they rig the test.
> http://news.google.com/news?&q=missile+test+rigged
>
We need a defense system to deflect incomming insults.
-- Luhan Monat (luhanis 'at' yahoo 'dot' com) "The future is not what it used to be..." http://members.cox.net/berniekm
- Next message: hamilton: "Re: seeking graphical LCD with built-in controller"
- Previous message: Luhan Monat: "Re: EEPROM checksum error"
- In reply to: JeffM: "Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
