Re: antenna length vs. dielectric constant?
From: Rich Grise (richgrise_at_example.net)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Any bad capacitor brands?--Addendum"
- Previous message: Rob Gaddi: "Re: garbage bins/ securuty gates and RFID"
- In reply to: James Meyer: "Re: antenna length vs. dielectric constant?"
- Next in thread: Mac: "Re: antenna length vs. dielectric constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:56:43 GMT
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:43:06 +0000, James Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:47:08 GMT, Mac <foo@bar.net> wroth:
>
>>> Suppose you needed to communicate with a submarine and could put both
>>> antennas underwater?
>>
>>You mean a full size submarine? In the ocean? Are you familiar with the
>>expression "lossy dielectric?"
>>
>>Just wondering.
>
> It's for a small model of a submarine that will be used to test a
> prototype propulsion system and it will be deployed in a large fresh water
> flooded stone quarry. A few hundred feet of range is all we need. That's all
> I'm allowed say right now.
>
This sounds like a job for ultrasonic, if you can filter out bottom
clutter.
Good Luck!
Rich
- Next message: Rich Grise: "Re: Any bad capacitor brands?--Addendum"
- Previous message: Rob Gaddi: "Re: garbage bins/ securuty gates and RFID"
- In reply to: James Meyer: "Re: antenna length vs. dielectric constant?"
- Next in thread: Mac: "Re: antenna length vs. dielectric constant?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|