Re: Current source design (tricky?)
From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 03/13/05
- Next message: Brian: "Re: PIC programmer"
- Previous message: Tim Shoppa: "Re: PIC programmer"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Current source design (tricky?)"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: Current source design (tricky?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:39:55 GMT
John Larkin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:58:39 -0800, "Larry Brasfield"
> <donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I must say that it is a lot easier to understand
>>somebody's points when they are not buried
>>in a stream of invective. I appreciate your
>>reasoned approach to this.
>
>
> Well, I enjoy life, and Fred doesn't.
>
> John
>
This Brasfield worm is a born-again xtian scumball from Washington
state. He has an agenda- and it has nothing to do with engineering. Did
you see the feckless little worm skulk out of the encoder divider thread
- after coming in there like the big deal engineer- turned out the
maggot can't even handle elementary logic. He is is finished- all of his
posts, which are full of errors and pedantic drivel, will be scrutinized
and criticized for the trash they are. I'm not sure, but I think he is
that hermaphroditic looking thing originally from Texas- guess he will
be changing the sign-on name again...
- Next message: Brian: "Re: PIC programmer"
- Previous message: Tim Shoppa: "Re: PIC programmer"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Current source design (tricky?)"
- Next in thread: Fred Bloggs: "Re: Current source design (tricky?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]