Re: Very low power, power supply
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Chris Stephens: "Embedded TCP/IP on small micros with SMTP & 802.11"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT - Welcome to Doomsday"
- In reply to: Paul Burke: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:58:57 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Paul Burke <paul@scazon.com> wrote
(in <39t14hF4mtp4kU1@individual.net>) about 'Very low power, power
supply', on Thu, 17 Mar 2005:
>Don Pearce wrote:
>
>> You don't need a power supply. Put all the LEDs in series with each
>> other, and with a 5.6k resistor. Get a resistor with a power rating of
>> about 5 watts.
>
>Or a 250Vdc/160Vac 0.47uF cap. (assuming 60Hz) (about 50p from Farnell),
>then it doesn't get warm.
You need some resistance in series to prevent the inrush current zapping
the LEDs and/or the cap. For 120 V mains, 470 ohms 0.5 W may be enough.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Chris Stephens: "Embedded TCP/IP on small micros with SMTP & 802.11"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: OT - Welcome to Doomsday"
- In reply to: Paul Burke: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Very low power, power supply"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|