Re: [OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking number?
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: amplify 40kHz audio signal using TL082: first two stages are fine, but high noise from the third stage"
- Previous message: Chris Stephens: "Embedded TCP/IP on small micros with SMTP & 802.11"
- In reply to: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: [OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking number?"
- Next in thread: Mark Jones: "Re: [OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking number?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:05:55 +0000
I read in sci.electronics.design that Frithiof Andreas Jensen <frithiof.
jensen@die_spammer_die.ericsson.com> wrote (in <d1bn9q$3m4$1@newstree.wi
se.edt.ericsson.se>) about '[OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking
number?', on Thu, 17 Mar 2005:
>(Which is a shame because I personally liked to take a little time to
>reply posing as some white thrash arsehole and then to post their
>"business" mail account details in the appropriate alt.sex.* and
>misc.invest.* hierachies to pit them against both themselves and a bunch
>of persistent robo-mailers and virus-bots. For Phun).
I have occasionally replied, giving the bank account number of the UK
Inland Revenue and a contact phone number within the Metropolitan
Police. Without permission, of course.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Fred Bloggs: "Re: amplify 40kHz audio signal using TL082: first two stages are fine, but high noise from the third stage"
- Previous message: Chris Stephens: "Embedded TCP/IP on small micros with SMTP & 802.11"
- In reply to: Frithiof Andreas Jensen: "Re: [OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking number?"
- Next in thread: Mark Jones: "Re: [OT] Is this a valid USPS tracking number?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
