Re: role choices [was Re: amplify 40kHz ...]

From: Fred Bloggs (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 03/19/05 

Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:03:19 GMT

Larry Brasfield wrote:
> "John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in
> message news:r9ap31l305em4lpptkl8h0lgoeebe2ve94@4ax.com...
>
>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:54:11 -0800, "Larry Brasfield"
>><donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
>>>news:rj6p31pjrfdem8oevchd65dqa0hhhdidp7@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:07:03 -0800, "Larry Brasfield"
>>>><donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I consider my job well done when a poster goes away
>>>>>with his self esteem intact,
>>>>
>>>>---
>>>>Yet you often leave behind little pejorative comments when someone
>>>>disagrees with you which, if they're not responded to, can erode an
>>>>unwary recipient's self esteem.
>>>
>>>I have different objectives in discussion with people
>>>who want to play games rather than get a technical
>>>problem solved. The clauses you cut off my sentence
>>>would make that somewhat more evident.
>>
>>---
>>Repost them and prove your point.
>
>
>
> It's a state of mind which I reported and you
> already detected. What is there to prove?
> If you doubt it, then what was your point?

No one is interested in the perpetrator's claim to his "state of mind"-
the prisons would be empty if anyone bought into that bull***. You
really are a pathetically ignorant p.o.s., ng troll, and pretentious
little punk- who knows nothing btw...

>

Quantcast