Re: Wormhole theory
From: Kevin Aylward (see_website_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 03/27/05
- Next message: Jaggy Taggy: "Re: Industrial duty dimmer"
- Previous message: Mark Borgerson: "Re: GPS modules ?"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:45:22 GMT
Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <1111853242.843439.86330@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> [...]
>> And, if so, could this be how we all travel through time,
>
> To be more accurate, we are dragged kicking a screaming through time.
> The universe has 4 dimensions. We can move about in three of them.
> The fourth, we have no control over our motion in. Our lack of the
> control is the only special status that the forth dimension really
> has.
This is isn't really an accurate description. Under Special Relativity,
we can, essentially, move forward in time at any rate we please. Simply
moving gets us through time at different effective rates. The time
effects in special relativity can be interpreted in a few different
ways, but as far as net effect goes, travelling at fast velocities is
automatically time travel into the future. We don't actually do anything
to build such a time machine. We cant prevent it happening. That is, if
we go very fast relative to say, the motion of the earth, like go away
and come back, it is usually phrased as time travels slower for the
traveller. The actual reality is that earth would have "aged" on, and we
would not have "aged". This *is* time travel into the future. Its going
backwards in time that's the tricky bit.
>If you dropped through an event horizon of a black hole, you
> would find that you could move about in what we call "time" and two
> of the "space" dimensions but not the third. Along that third
> dimension, you would be dragged kicking and screaming to the
> singularity where you would be crushed out of existance.
>
> Don't be depressed. You can be crushed to death on any date in
> history you choose.
>
>
>> and why time
>> slows when an object viewed from another frame of reference
>> approaches the speed of light? And then could it tie into entropy
>> somehow?
>
> Entropy and the "arrow of time" do seem to be linked. The future is
> when entropy will be higher and it is the part of time that we can't
> remember.
Time is simply a note that the same object can exist in different
places. That is, objects move.
Kevin Aylward
informationEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
- Next message: Jaggy Taggy: "Re: Industrial duty dimmer"
- Previous message: Mark Borgerson: "Re: GPS modules ?"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Next in thread: John Woodgate: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Reply: John Woodgate: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Reply: Robert Baer: "Re: Wormhole theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]